
Thanks, Michiel.
Do you know the specific technical reason for that? Overall, we get very
good performance from our SQL Server instances on a variety of applications
so this has always confused me (but having used OTRS for over a year now, I
don't dispute it).
Is this related to the performance of DBD:ODBC relative to DBD:mysql and
the other "native" interfaces?
Hugh
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Michiel Beijen
Hi Hugh,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 16:54, Hugh Kelley
wrote: Has anyone been following (and better still, testing), the changes to DBD::ODBC (post 1.23_4)?
Presumably these were meant to improve the performance of SQL statement preparation for MSSQL via ODBC.
Yes, I am aware of these changes, and I was the one mentioned by Martin in his blog post complaining about poor DBD::ODBC performance.
Martin Evans made some changes based on findings I reported but OTRS on Microsoft SQL Server using DBD::ODBC is still *much* slower than on MySQL, PostgreSQL or Oracle, unfortunately.
Michiel Beijen Senior Consultant
OTRS BV Schipholweg 103 2316 XC Leiden The Netherlands
T: +31 71 8200 255 F: +31 71 8200 254 I: http://www.otrs.com
Making OTRS even better! Exclusive Feature Add-Ons improve usability of OTRS and extend its functionality: http://j.mp/ndQvZj --------------------------------------------------------------------- OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/ Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/otrs