
Hi Martin and others, The more I work with Siebel, and the more I think I will need OTRS to replace it in the near future... Instead of having two different numbering modules, I would propose the following: Attached to this e-mail, you will find a list of the current Siebel tickets in our system. They all start with a '1', and then there is a '-', and then 5 characters which increase from 1 to 9 and then from A to Z. I would create a new numbering scheme: 'x-xxxxx', where 'x' can be any of 0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ I would patch Postmaster.pl, so that an incoming e-mail with a subject that EXACTLY matches 'New SR: 1-A7ZB2' would create a new ticket with the number '1-A7ZB2', instead of a new ticket with the next available number in the numbering scheme. Then if an incoming e-mail DOESN'T match this string, or if we open a ticket by a phone call, then I would just make the first character of the ticket number a LETTER instead of a NUMBER. ie 'A-1G4X3'. This way, we know that if the ticket starts with a LETTER, then it's an internal OTRS ticket, and if it starts with a NUMBER, then it's a ticket matching a Siebel ticket. Do you understant where I would like to go ? Do you see this as easier than having TWO numering schemes ? Do you know someone who has nothing else to do than writing such a numering module ;-) ? I am sorry for this request which might be a bit strange, but just imagine that we are at the moment handling about 20 tickets per day, most of them containing firewall information (routing tables, policy screenshots...) with a CRM system which costs millions of $$$, which has a limitation of 800 characters for an action entry on a ticket, and which doesn't support file attachement (at the moment). Thx again for your incredible support... BR, - Patrick -
-----Original Message----- From: Patrick Zwahlen [mailto:Patrick.Zwahlen@eu.didata.com] Sent: lundi, 14. juillet 2003 13:36 To: 'otrs@otrs.org' Subject: RE: [otrs] Siebel integration, kind of...
I would first try to understand this #§¬@! Siebel numbering logic. And I would also prefer to turn this into a general improvement, instead of a very specific feature... if possible !
This would be possible and more appreciated by the community! :)
Right ! I just forgot to mention that I *used* to be a programmer, but I fear I have now crossed the dark line of management ;-)))
BR, - Patrick -
______________________________________________ DISCLAIMER This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. The contents do not represent the opinion of Dimension Data Switzerland except to the extent that it relates to their official business. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender by return e-mail, then delete this message and any attachments. Dimension Data Switzerland : http://www.ch.didata.com
_______________________________________________ OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/ Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/otrs