Hello,

that's exactly what I followed. My first impression is that with such a setup, changes cannot be created/executed in a sane way. I'm a developer myself, so conditions and actions are not foreign for me, but if I have to define this huge number of conditions for each change I have to manage, that's a bit of an overkill (even with using templates). However, it is likely that I didn't understand the whole change thing in ITSM :-) Isn't it a bit over-complicated?

Best,
Gergely

On 14 Apr 2014 16:15, "Florian Edlhuber" <florian.edlhuber@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi,

14.04.2014 14:57 - Gergely Polonkai schrieb:Hello,
> is there anyone on this list who has successfully implemented a Change
> in ITSM 3.x?

Yes. :)

> I have tried and tried, but cannot go forward from requested
> to approved state. Is there a fully blown tutorial on this?
 

See http://otrs.github.io/doc/manual/itsm/3.3/en/html/ch08s05.html#idp37007488
and in detail the conditions actions section.

you can not set a state without conditions/actions.

(there is a test scenario sysconfig setting...) ;)

Florian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/
Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs
To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/otrs