Re: [otrs] OTRS on linux vs windows

We have been using 2.4.x on Windows with no issues for about a year now. I tested with both Windows and linux at the time. The linux system was noticeably faster when dealing with system parameters, but I couldn't get the active directory authentication working correctly under linux at the time (even with same config information from working windows box), so ended up on Windows since AD authentication was a very important requirement. ----- Original Message ----- From: Nathan Campbell To: "User questions and discussions about OTRS." Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 2:43:56 AM Subject: [otrs] OTRS on linux vs windows

Exactly!

Nathan Campbell Dallas Symphony Orchestra

On 1/29/11 10:42 AM, "Ralf Hildebrandt" wrote:

...

* Nathan Campbell :

...

I've run OTRS 2.x and now 3.x on Windows 2003 as well as 2008 for a couple of years with relatively few problems, certainly nothing like what Jan experienced. Our biggest problem has been growth of the database in MSSQL 2005. I also had some problems with the size of the database, but fortunately OTRS now allows me to put attachments into the filesystem, thus keeping the DB small and tidy

-- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebrandt@charite.de | http://www.charite.de

--------------------------------------------------------------------- OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/ Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/otrs

--------------------------------------------------------------------- OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/ Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/otrs