
My guess is that:
a) a ticket type had to be chosen to create the ticket, and it's coding-wise
easier to set a ticket type than to guess/pass the ticket type. and
b) a split ticket didn't come from the customer, it was initiated by an
agent. As a ticket that did not originate via email, phone makes sense as
the only other option.
(hypothesis based upon programming logic, not workflow logic.)
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:59 AM, martinliu_cn
** I have same idea with Philippe.
Phone ticket sould be just a source of ticket. No matter any difference of source, ticket should be same.
Regards,
2011-06-10 ------------------------------ martin liu http://martinliu.cn ------------------------------ 发件人: "Martignier, Philippe"
发送时间: 2011-06-10 16:37 主 题: [otrs] why is the split function always giving a phone ticket 收件人: "otrs@otrs.org" Hi there,****
** **
Still under 2.4.8 I have a question. Why is the split function always giving a phone ticket ?****
** **
If the ticket is created by an incoming email, it should keep the same type of ticket … because then when you do stats about tickets type you wont get reality …****
** **
Any response welcome****
** **
Cheers,****
** **
Philippe****
** **
Philippe Martignier****
Communications Division****
Customer Service Center****
Email : Philippe.Martignier@wipo.int****
Phone : 00 41 022 338 72 36****
Building : NC ****
Office : 3, 316****
** **
World Intellectual Property Organization Disclaimer:
This electronic message may contain privileged, confidential and copyright protected information. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail and all its attachments. Please ensure all e-mail attachments are scanned for viruses prior to opening or using.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/ Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/otrs